Project 2025 is more than just a benign collection of policy ideas; it’s a blueprint for transforming the American government across multiple levels. Crafted by the Heritage Foundation and conservative leaders, the plan lays out …
We are now in the home stretch of our deep dive into Project 2025 and our attempt to understand, to the fullest extent, the conservative blueprint for the most radical transformation of the United States …
Project 2025 outlines a comprehensive plan aimed at reshaping the U.S. education system by promoting greater educational freedom and enhancing parental rights. Key proposals include expanding school choice through voucher programs, reducing federal oversight, and …
Part 11 of the deep dive into Project 2025’s Pillar #4 offers a vision of personal freedoms rooted in conservative values. On the one hand, this pillar emphasizes religious liberty, gun rights, and minimal government …
Project 2025 suggests that a new Republican president take steps to reduce the level of international engagement to which the United States is currently committed. It envisions this happening through two moves: Both of these …
Pillar #3 of Project 2025 seeks to bolster our national security by reinforcing U.S. sovereignty, tightening immigration controls, and safeguarding American resources from global threats- all in ways conservatives want. The authors of Project 2025 …
Here, we wrap up our dive into Pillar 2 of Project 2025, highlighting its goals and objectives and showing where it provides extensive proposals for how the next Republican President can dismantle and reshape the …
Part 7 of the Project 2025 Pillar 2 continues below. It touches on the many areas of regulation the U.S. government oversees and how changes in these regulations could impact the lives of everyday citizens, …
Our first five posts on Project 2025 introduce the project and its creators. We also discuss some dramatic policy proposals and the four overarching goals under Pillar 1 of the Project—“Re-establishing the Family as the …
The debate over eliminating the federal role in disaster relief brings up important considerations. On the one hand, proponents argue that shifting disaster response to state and local governments would reduce federal spending and promote …