facebook
__CONFIG_widget_menu__{"menu_id":"866","dropdown_icon":"style_1","mobile_icon":"style_1","dir":"tve_horizontal","icon":{"top":"","sub":""},"layout":{"default":"grid"},"type":"regular","mega_desc":"e30=","images":[],"logo":false,"responsive_attributes":{"top":{"desktop":"text","tablet":"","mobile":""},"sub":{"desktop":"text","tablet":"","mobile":""}},"actions":[],"uuid":"m-181b8bae428","template":"39777","template_name":"Dropdown 01","unlinked":{".menu-item-16075":false,".menu-item-16081":false,".menu-item-16080":false,".menu-item-16079":false,".menu-item-16078":false,".menu-item-16077":false},"top_cls":{".menu-item-16075":"",".menu-item-16077":"","main":"",".menu-item-16081":"",".menu-item-16080":""},"tve_tpl_menu_meta":{"menu_layout_type":"Horizontal"},"tve_shortcode_rendered":1}__CONFIG_widget_menu__

Birthright citizenship ban sparks lawsuit against Trump administration

Lawsuit Challenges Constitutionality of Birthright Citizenship Ban

A coalition of progressive organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), has filed a lawsuit against President Donald Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship for children born in the U.S. to undocumented parents. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire, argues the order is unconstitutional and violates the 14th Amendment.

The lawsuit is backed by groups such as the Asian Law Caucus, the State Democracy Defenders Fund, the Legal Defense Fund, and local organizations like New Hampshire Indonesian Community Support and Make the Road New York.

Advocacy Groups Defend Birthright Citizenship

The ACLU and its partners assert that Trump’s executive order undermines a fundamental American principle. “Birthright citizenship is what makes the United States a strong and dynamic nation,” said ACLU Executive Director Anthony Romero. The groups argue that the order represents an extreme overreach and are confident the courts will overturn it.

Matthew Soerens of World Relief, a Christian humanitarian organization, also criticized the measure as unconstitutional and harmful. He contended that birthright citizenship has historically supported America’s growth and integration of immigrant populations.

Trump Administration Justifies Restrictions on Birthright Citizenship

The executive order, issued early in Trump’s presidency, interprets the 14th Amendment as excluding children born to undocumented parents or temporary residents from automatic citizenship. The order claims the amendment was never intended to grant universal citizenship to everyone born in the U.S.

Proponents of the policy argue it addresses concerns about unlawful immigration and the misuse of legal protections. However, critics point to the 1898 Supreme Court decision in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, which affirmed citizenship for individuals born in the U.S. regardless of their parents’ nationality.

Broader Concerns Surrounding the Executive Order

Critics argue the executive order could lead to stateless children and a larger undocumented population, straining societal integration. Supporters of the policy believe it could deter unauthorized immigration, but detractors emphasize the importance of adhering to constitutional processes for such significant changes.


Source:

ACLU, immigrant advocacy groups, sue Trump over birthright citizenship restrictions
Photo by Sollange Brenis on Unsplash

About Post Author


Related Daily News

>