Federal Charges Still Pending Amid Government Shutdown
Though McElrath has been sentenced on state charges, his legal troubles are not over. He still faces federal charges of coercion and enticement of a minor. These charges stem from his use of text messaging and online communication to groom and exploit the victim. Surveillance videos provided to federal investigators further support these charges, showing him secretly entering and exiting the church on May 31, 2024. Footage also captured the minor arriving and leaving the premises around the same time.
The U.S. Department of Justice has not provided updates on the federal case. According to its website, all non-essential communications are delayed due to the current federal government shutdown. Legal analysts say federal charges could add significantly to McElrath’s sentence if convicted.
Church Implements New Safeguards Post-Scandal
In the wake of the incident, Fellowship Bible Church has taken steps to prevent future abuse. Two external agencies conducted independent reviews of church safety policies. Although their identities remain undisclosed, church officials claim the reviews validated existing protocols. However, all staff and volunteers are now required to complete child abuse prevention training as part of their onboarding.
Church communications director Hillary Johnson emphasized that McElrath’s actions were deliberate violations of the rules. “Had he abided by these protocols, no harm would have befallen the victim,” she said, noting that his failure to fully bypass safeguards played a role in his eventual prosecution.
Community Divided Over Church Response
Supporters of Fellowship Bible Church have praised its prompt action following McElrath’s arrest and its ongoing care for the victim. Many members believe the church’s transparency and post-incident reforms demonstrate a genuine commitment to child safety.
Detractors, however, argue that existing safeguards were inadequate if McElrath could exploit them. They question whether warning signs were missed and call for more robust oversight. Some also criticize the church for withholding details about the agencies involved in the safety review, citing a lack of transparency.
The case has reignited broader concerns about accountability in religious institutions and the need for stricter vetting and supervision of church leaders.
Source:
Photo by K. Mitch Hodge on Unsplash
About Post Author
