Key Points
- A federal appeals court ruled that tax-exempt status doesn’t qualify as federal assistance under law, affecting Title IX compliance.
- The case involved Concordia Prep, accused of violating Title IX in handling bullying and sexual harassment claims, asserting it wasn’t subject to Title IX as it didn’t receive federal financial aid.
- The decision reverses a lower court’s ruling, emphasizing that tax exemption is different from receiving federal financial assistance, impacting how Title IX is applied to religious and other nonprofit institutions.
A recent court decision has clarified the relationship between tax-exempt status and federal assistance in the context of Title IX regulations. This case revolved around Concordia Prep, a Lutheran school in Maryland, against which a former student filed a lawsuit alleging violations of Title IX due to the school’s handling of bullying and sexual harassment claims.
The school argued that it was exempt from Title IX regulations as it did not receive federal financial assistance. A lower court had previously ruled that the school’s tax-exempt status constituted a form of federal funding, thus requiring compliance with Title IX. However, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit overturned this decision, stating that tax-exempt status does not equate to receiving federal financial assistance.
This ruling, described as consistent with the text and precedent of Title IX, ensures that tax exemption is distinguished from the direct receipt of federal funds. The decision is significant for religious and nonprofit organizations, clarifying that tax-exempt status alone does not subject them to Title IX regulations.
Catholic News Agency reports:
Greg Baylor, a senior counsel with the legal advocacy group Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), which filed an amicus brief in the case, told CNA that the ruling was “consistent with the text of Title IX statute and regulation and precedence.”
“For decades virtually everyone has understood that federal financial assistance consists of grants, contracts, property, and things of that nature,” Baylor said.
“No one has seriously argued that an organization’s possession of mere tax-exempt status counts as federal financial assistance.”
“We’re grateful that the 4th Circuit overruled the lower court decision,” Baylor said. “Under the reasoning of the lower court, hundreds of thousands of nonprofits would be subject to this burdensome law. We’re grateful for the decision.”
Title IX was passed as a component of the federal Education Amendments of 1972 and signed into law by President Richard Nixon. It has been a major factor in U.S. education law and policy for decades.
Pros and Cons
| Themes | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Legal Clarity | Clarifies that tax-exempt status alone doesn’t subject institutions to Title IX, safeguarding the autonomy of religious and nonprofit entities. | May limit accountability measures for institutions not directly receiving federal financial assistance but benefiting from federal tax exemptions. |
| Title IX Application | Ensures that Title IX’s scope is accurately interpreted and applied, focusing on entities receiving direct federal aid. | Could narrow the protective reach of Title IX, potentially leaving gaps in protection for individuals at institutions not covered due to this ruling. |
| Religious Freedom | Affirms the separation between church and state by respecting the financial independence of religious institutions from federal compliance requirements. | Might be perceived as a loophole allowing certain institutions to bypass important federal protections against discrimination and harassment. |
Questions to Consider
- How does this ruling impact the balance between religious freedom and the protection of individuals from discrimination and harassment?
- In what ways might Congress or the courts clarify the application of Title IX to ensure it adequately protects against sex discrimination without overreaching into the autonomy of religious and nonprofit institutions?
- What implications does this decision have for the broader landscape of federal funding, tax exemption, and compliance with civil rights laws?
About Post Author
