Key Points
- Arizona House Republicans have successfully blocked attempts to repeal an 1864 law that protects life from conception, which has been inoperative since Roe v. Wade but is set to be reactivated.
- The law prohibits all abortions except when the mother’s life is in danger, overriding the current legality of abortions up to the 15th week of pregnancy.
- The tension in the Arizona House included severe criticisms from Democrats, while Republicans defended the law based on their belief in the sanctity of life.
Arizona lawmakers have voted to keep a historical law from 1864, which prohibits abortions from the moment of conception, amidst intense legislative debate and public controversy. This decision comes after recent judicial developments that allowed the old statute to potentially become enforceable again.
The law, which had been dormant since the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, was briefly discussed for repeal following the U.S. Supreme Court’s overruling of Roe in the 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson decision. However, the state’s House Republicans blocked this move. Currently, Arizona allows abortions until the 15th week of pregnancy, but if the 1864 law is fully reactivated, it would ban all abortions unless the procedure is necessary to save a woman’s life.
Catholic News Agency reports:
Arizona House Republicans blocked two attempts on Wednesday to repeal an 1864 law protecting life at conception.
In a near party-line 30-30 vote on Wednesday, House Democrats failed to gain a majority of votes to suspend the Legislature’s rules to fast-track a so-called “abortion ban repeal” bill that would have overturned the 1864 pro-life law.
Dormant since being invalidated by Roe v. Wade in 1973, the 1864 law protects all unborn life from conception and imposes prison time for those who “provide, supply, or administer” an abortion.
This temporarily stalls ongoing efforts to repeal the law, which is set to go into effect in the next 37 days.
Debate on the House floor was tense just before the vote as Democrats called the pro-life law “abhorrent” and “archaic.”
Democratic Rep. Alma Hernandez bashed Republicans, saying that “the fact that we will not even entertain a motion to allow those who have been raped or pregnant by incest to be able to have an abortion is extremely, extremely disappointing.”
Republican Rep. Ben Toma, meanwhile, said: “I understand that we have deeply held beliefs [about abortion], and I would ask everyone in this chamber to respect the fact that some of us believe that abortion is in fact the murder of children.”
Pros and Cons
| Theme | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Legal Protection of Life | Reinforces the beliefs of pro-life advocates about the sanctity of life from conception. | May lead to severe restrictions on women’s rights and healthcare choices. |
| Legislative Process | Demonstrates the functioning of democratic processes in legislative debates. | Reflects deep partisan divisions that can delay or block significant legislative actions. |
| Public Safety and Health | Could potentially decrease the number of abortions performed, aligning with some ethical perspectives. | Risks increasing unsafe, illegal abortions and endangering women’s health due to lack of legal options. |
Questions to Consider
- How will the enforcement of the 1864 law affect healthcare providers and women in Arizona?
- What are the broader implications of this law for abortion rights debates in other U.S. states?
- How does the reinstatement of such an old law reflect on modern legislative and judicial processes in the U.S.?
About Post Author
